Legal Opinion

Roberts v. H. Gin Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

The plaintiffs in this action for broker’s commissions are licensed real estate brokers: plaintiff Sidro Realty Corp. (Sidro) and its president, Sidney Roberts (Roberts), are licensed as a real estate broker under the laws of the State of New York, and plaintiff Norman Novic (Novic) is licensed under the laws of the State of New Jersey.

The defendants now move for summary judgment dismiss*619ing the complaint on the ground that as a matter of law the alleged oral brokerage agreement is unenforceable, because one of the cobrokers is not licensed as a real estate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. NFS Services, Inc. v. West 73rd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amirkhanian v. BernikerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API