Legal Opinion

Isaiah Hicks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 2, 2018No. 16-2592PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, Circuit Judge.

*649 A jury found Isaiah Hicks guilty of multiple drug offenses. He was sentenced to 360 months in prison. After we upheld his convictions and sentence on direct appeal, he filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming that that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. Hicks asserted that his attorney failed to explain to him the breadth of conspiracy law, understated the evidence against him, and failed to confer with him about pleading guilty. Going to trial cost him a potential reduction in his offense level at sentencing, Hicks claimed, which would…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Roger G. Galbraith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. DekelaitaDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  3. Bonk v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Dukes v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Halliburton v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API