Legal Opinion
Roger G. Galbraith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-4263PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
In this successive appeal, Roger Galbraith argues that his unconditional guilty plea to certain methamphetamine charges was unknowing, involuntary and unintelligent, and was the product of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. In an earlier determination, Galbraith’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search was denied. Subsequently, Galbraith submitted an unconditional guilty plea to both charges on the day his jury trial was to commence. On appeal, his attempt to seek review of the denial of his motion to suppress evidence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jack R. Prewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Byron Blake v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Fernando Delatorre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Kafo, Saidi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Brian Boulb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.