Legal Opinion

Freund v. Hyman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1954No. Appeal, 194PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Mrs. Freund brought an action of trespass against the defendants for injuries resulting from a fall on the pavement of the defendant, Hyman, on Locust Street, Ephrata, at 1 o’clock in the afternoon of August 22, *361951. She appealed from the order of nonsuit entered against her by the Court below.

She was walking on the pavement along Locust Street about a foot behind Mrs. Frank and talking with her. The day was clear. Plaintiff’s pertinent testimony was as follows: “Q. I show you ‘C.P. No. 1’ [a photograph] and ask whether that shows the pavement along Locust…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Nitch v. MoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API