Legal Opinion · Dissent

Toward Utility Rate Normalization v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1978No. S.F. 23668Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

The convoluted history of the Public Utilities Commission’s adoption of single message rate timing (SMRT) is a seemingly endless series of false starts, second thoughts, and reversals which does little credit to the administrative process.1 From this welter of indecision, however, there *546has now emerged at least one clear result: ratepayers who subscribe to the limited service of 60 local message units per month are to be the guinea pigs in the SMRT experiment. Although these ratepayers constitute but 11 percent of residential customers, the decision under review makes them the only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Associated Freight Lines v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API