Associated Freight Lines v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Encinal Terminals applied to the Public Utilities Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity that would extend its operating authority as a highway common carrier. After a hearing the commission granted the certificate. Competing carriers who protested in that proceeding were denied a rehearing, and upon their petition we issued a writ of review.
The commission’s decision contains a summary of the evidence, and the following findings:
“The Commission finds that public convenience and necessity require the granting of the authority sought, subject to the conditions in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Zozaya v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.