Legal Opinion

Associated Freight Lines v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1963No. S. F. No. 21242PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Encinal Terminals applied to the Public Utilities Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity that would extend its operating authority as a highway common carrier. After a hearing the commission granted the certificate. Competing carriers who protested in that proceeding were denied a rehearing, and upon their petition we issued a writ of review.

The commission’s decision contains a summary of the evidence, and the following findings:

“The Commission finds that public convenience and necessity require the granting of the authority sought, subject to the conditions in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Zozaya v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API