Legal Opinion

Kay v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1984No. 84-135PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This case involves interpretation of Rule 15 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court refused to allow either party to amend their pleadings after a certain date and because of the peculiar facts of the case, we cannot say he abused his discretion. The judgment is affirmed.

The Kays’ house, insured by the appellee, Economy, burned on June 19, 1980, and was totally destroyed. A proper proof of loss was submitted and Economy rejected it because the claim was “excessive, inaccurate, non-supported and not properly detailed.” The Kays filed this suit on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Broadway Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dupree v. Twin City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Turner v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Miller v. JasinskiCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Williams v. Brushy Island Public Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API