Legal Opinion

Cook v. Hammett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1943No. 30597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, claiming title by virtue of a deed from the county commissioners, commenced this action against plaintiffs in error in ejectment, for rents, profits, and damages and to quiet title to land described in McIntosh county, Okla.

In a first cause of action for ejectment plaintiff alleged his title by deed from McIntosh county, a copy of which deed was attached to his petition. In a second cause of action to quiet title plaintiff alleged ownership in fee-simple title of the land, setting forth the land was sold for taxes to McIntosh county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DeeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Taylor v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Gentry v. McCurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kasner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Sun Oil Company, as Successor by Merger to Sunray Dx Oil Company v. Vernie FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. North v. CoffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Murray v. Link Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Hale v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API