Brown v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentFisher, Associate Judge
“[T]he excited utterance exception is just that — an exception to the hearsay rule, and it should not be construed so broadly that it renders the hearsay rule ineffectual.” State v. Branch, 182 N.J. 338, 865 A.2d 673, 690 (2005) (emphasis in original). “Over the years, some of our cases have imported a measure of flexibility into the admissibility calculus of spontaneous exclamations and excited utterances, but the fundamentals of the doctrine have remained intact.” Odemns v. United States, 901 A.2d 770, 778 (D.C.2006). On this record, I conclude that Mr. Brown’s utterances were neither…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- State v. BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- United States v. Lawrence KearneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Randolph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.