Legal Opinion
Course v. Pacific Inland Navigation Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 20, 1964No. Civ. No. 64-225PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The defendant Pacific Inland Navigation Company (Pinco) owns and operates barges and tugs, with shore facilities, upon the navigable waters of the Columbia and Willamette Rivers and is a citizen of the State of Washington; and
The plaintiff Delbert A. Course (Course) is employed by Pinco as a harbor worker (marine electrician) on Pineo’s tugs and barges, at random as directed, as distinguished from being a member of a crew of any particular vessel, and is a citizen of the State of Oregon.
Course alleges that while working aboard one of Pinco’s tugs in the course of his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Vann v. WillieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978