Legal Opinion
Eisert v. Urick Foundry Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 392PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
In this civil action the two plaintiffs-have sued the defendant corporation, invoking the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.,. to recover minimum wages, overtime-compensation, liquidated damages and counsel fees under Sections 6, 7 and 16-of the Act. The case was tried nonjury. It has some unusual aspects. The defendant corporation is the successor iru ownership of a foundry business formerly owned by the plaintiffs and three other persons and operated as a partnership, in the City of Erie. On the formation, of the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sun Pub. Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. YeakleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Helliwell v. HabermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SNYDER v. BIROSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023