Morback v. Young
Oregon Supreme Court
From Washington: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Action by Maud Morback against W. F. Young and J. H. Morback, as copartners, to recover $560 for labor performed by plaintiff for defendants as cook, between the 9th of May, 1904, and the 9th of July, 1905. Defendant Morback made default, but Young answered, denying the partnership, as well as other alleged facts in the complaint. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant Young appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
This is an action brought against W. F. Young and J. H. Morback, as copartners, doing business under the firm name of Young & Morback, to recover $560 for labor and services as cook alleged to have been performed by plaintiff for defendants between the 9th of May, 1904, and the 9th of July, 1905. Morback made default, but Young answered, putting in issue the alleged partnership, as well as the other facts alleged in-the complaint. Plaintiff had judgment, and Young appeals, assigning as error the overruling of his motion for nonsuit.
1. The only question to which our attention will be directed,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. A. Babcock Co. v. KatzOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Morback v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Baker v. SeaweardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Gettins v. HennesseyOregon Supreme Court · 1912