Commonwealth v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
By St. 1986, c. 336, the “asbestos revival statute,” the Legislature established special time periods during which the Commonwealth and its subdivisions could bring an action, otherwise time-barred, to recover the cost of asbestos removal from public buildings.2 We are asked to decide whether that statute also revives claims against installers of asbestos, against whom an action would otherwise be time-barred by G. L. c. 260, § 2B, a “statute of repose” relating to construction projects. The installers (see note 1, supra) moved successfully in the Superior Court for summary judgment. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- City of Boston v. Keene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Mirageas v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Tindol v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bridgwood v. A.J. Wood Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Chace v. CurranMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
- Town of Weymouth v. WelchMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
- In Re Asbestos Litigation, 01-4147 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.