Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1976No. 6262PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order of the family court which, pursuant to HRS § 571-22, waived jurisdiction and ordered a minor held for criminal proceedings with respect to an alleged burglary committed after his 16th birthday. Appellant has moved for a stay of execution of the family court order, so as to prevent his indictment and trial during the pendency of the appeal.

Appellant was born on April 3, 1958 and became an adult on his 18th birthday, April 3, 1976. The alleged offense was committed on March 8, 1976. Although appellant is no longer a minor, the exclusive original jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. John Wayne Kemplen v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Younghans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Billy Ray Powell v. Carl G. Hocker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StanleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In the Interest of DinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. BrezeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. LimozHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API