Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Apfel
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided November 30, 1998No. CV 98-N-0346-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
EDWIN L. NELSON, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
The claimant, Charles R. Roberts (“Roberts”), appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying him social security disability insurance benefits. The case is now properly before this Court. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1998). The issues have been briefed by the parties, and are now ripe for decision. Upon due consideration, the decision of the Commissioner will be reversed and the cause remanded for further consideration. Because the result here turns entirely on a question of law, the court’s recitation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- James E. PASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- QUANG VAN HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- James F. LAMB, A/N 252-48-2311, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006