Hansen v. Sullivan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
In the complaint in this case, there are three causes of action, separately stated, each based upon a promissory note signed' by the defendant P. E. Sullivan, who will be referred to as though he were the only party defendant. The defendant appeared by answer and cross-complaint, and in the latter sought to recover damages ag’ainst the plaintiff and have them offset against the liability on the notes. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the defendant was entitled to the relief which he sought. From the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- State ex rel. Lundin v. Merchants Protective Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Bank v. . Finance, Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Myers v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Standard Optical Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1943