Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Sullivan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1935No. 25715. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case, there are three causes of action, separately stated, each based upon a promissory note signed' by the defendant P. E. Sullivan, who will be referred to as though he were the only party defendant. The defendant appeared by answer and cross-complaint, and in the latter sought to recover damages ag’ainst the plaintiff and have them offset against the liability on the notes. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the defendant was entitled to the relief which he sought. From the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Lundin v. Merchants Protective Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Bank v. . Finance, Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Myers v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Standard Optical Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API