State v. Feingold
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Prosecution for selling merchandise in violation of the statute concerning itinerant vendors, brought to the City Court of New Haven and thence, by appeal of the accused, to the Criminal Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and reserved by that court, Hubbard, J., upon a demurrer* to the complaint, for the advice of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtHamersley, J.
In 1897 the legislature passed an Act entitled “An Act concerning Itinerant Vendors.” Public Acts of 1897, p. 855, Chap. 152. This Act, with subsequent alterations and additions, is incorporated in the General Statutes under the heading “Itinerant Vendors,” §§ 4662 to 4668. Section 4663 provides that every itinerant vendor who shall sell or expose for sale, at public or private sale, any goods without State and local licenses therefor, issued as hereinafter provided, shall be punished by fine and imprisonment.
The defendant in the present case is charged with the violation of this section, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. LoomisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. ConlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Braceville Coal Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Giragi v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Woolf v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.