Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnston v. . Case

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1DissentClark, J.

This is an action of ejectment, and it is alleged by the plaintiffs and admitted by the defendants that James Case, the ancestor of the defendants, at one time was the owner of the land in controversy. And the plaintiff undertook to show that he had acquired the title of James Case, and is now the owner of the land. He undertook to do this by a mortgage deed from James Case to William Case, dated 24 December, 1850; a deed from William Case to W. L. Henry, dated 15 March, 1855; a deed from Sumner, sheriff, to George Brooks, dated 11 September, 1869; a deed dated 13 November, 1882, from parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . FiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Patterson v. . GalliherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Midgett v. . TwifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. O. Sprinkle v. . Julius MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Williams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Newkirk v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Smith v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API