Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1955No. Crim. No. 5591; S. F. No. 19158Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

I see no occasion for reading words into section 1506 of the Penal Code which makes appealable only an order of the *11superior court which discharges petitioner from custody. It has been-held repeatedly that in only those situations expressly covered by section 1506 was an order in habeas corpus proceedings appealable because the rule prior to its enactment had been that the state could not appeal. (In re Alpine, 203 Cal. 731 [265 P. 947, 58 A.L.R. 1500]; In re Bruegger, 204 Cal. 169 [267 P. 101]; Thuesen v. Superior Court, 215 Cal. 572 [12 P.2d 8]; Loustalot v. Superior Court, 30…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. In Re RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API