Legal Opinion

Amaeshi Nwozuzu v. Daniel E. Cueva, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01518Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAESHI NWOZUZU, No. 2:24-cv-01518 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prisoner and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) that is before the 19 undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the 20 undersigned finds that the FAC fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be 21…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API