Amaeshi Nwozuzu v. Daniel E. Cueva, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAESHI NWOZUZU, No. 2:24-cv-01518 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prisoner and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) that is before the 19 undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the 20 undersigned finds that the FAC fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be 21…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.