Gould & Kane, Inc. v. Valterza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
In an action to obtain an injunction to prevent the defendants from maintaining a nuisance the trial court awarded the plaintiff a judgment. The defendants have appealed and have brought up the judgment roll. In effect the defendants contend that the plaintiff’s complaint did not state a cause of action, that its allegations were not sustained by the proof, and that the judgment is not supported by the findings.
The plaintiff corporation owns adjoining lots located in a certain block facing Kains Avenue. The defendants own lots in the same block facing San Pablo Avenue. Said lots abut at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Hassell v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Schneider v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Daubenspeck v. GrearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Randall v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wade v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- In Re ValterzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940