Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works & Supply Co. v. Haslach

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.

We have here a motion by plaintiff to confirm the report of the commissioners of appraisal in this proceeding which was instituted to condemn a small parcel of property taken from defendants’ poultry farm, which parcel is to be used in connection with a large public water supply reservoir. The defendants take exception to the report on the grounds, among others, that an allowance was not made to them for all damages sustained, including, in particular, consequential damages (due to the irregularity of the remainder of defendants’ lands after the taking; and to the alleged necessity of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. South Buffalo Railway Co. v. KirkoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Matter of City of New York (Fourth Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Adirondack Power & Light Corp. v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Board of Supervisors v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API