Legal Opinion

Decker v. Brooklyn Strand Theatre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that it affirmatively appears from the proof that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. (Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co., 156 App. Div. 368.) Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents, with the following memorandum: Whether or not the plaintiff was guilty of negligence contributing to the injury was a question of fact for the jury. In the circumstances presented she, unacquainted with her surroundings, had the right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyce v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franczak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Schwartz v. International Vaudeville Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. Schneider v. Associated Prudential Theatres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API