Legal Opinion
Franczak v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 1940No. Claim No. 24408PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
‘Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We think the award was not excessive and that it is supported by the weight of the evidence and applicable principles of law. (See Potter v. New York, O. & W. R. Co., 261 N. Y. 489, 493; Charles v. Barrett, 233 id. 127, 129; Bensonhurst National Bank v. City of New York, 252 App. Div. 689, 691; affd., 277 N. Y. 722; Smith v. State of New York, 243 App. Div. 682; affd., 268 N. Y. 551; Schumer v. Caplin, 241 id. 346, 351; McCabe v. Mackay, 233 App. Div. 101; Brown v. Wittner, 43 id. 135, 137; Lee v. Ingraham, 106 id. 167, 169, 170; Kenney v.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Weston v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Boyce v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Schabel v. Onseyga Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Schindler v. Welz & ZerweckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scully v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Boniface v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940