Legal Opinion

Russell v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The essential facts which the plaintiff undertook to prove as a part of his case were (1) that the fire was discovered within a short time after the passage of defendant’s locomotives, (2) that it started upon the side of the barn roof nearest to the tracks, (3) that the wind was blowing from the track toward the buildings, and (4) that the engines which passed might have emitted sparks. It was apparently conceived by the plaintiff that proof of these facts would justify a finding that the fire was caused by a spark from a locomotive. The defendant not only took issue with the plaintiff upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Finkelston v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cozzi v. HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Harmon v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Ahern v. Eldrebge Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Carignan v. WheelerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Davis v. Nox-All Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API