Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Edmark Industries SDN. Bhd. v. South Asia International (H.K.) Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 1, 2000No. Civ.A. 1:98CV1530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

Before this court is plaintiff Edmark’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Azad International Inc. (Azad). Edmark moved for summary judgement on its claims against Azad for (1) copyright infringement; (2) violation of the Lanham Act for false advertising; and (3) common law unfair competition.

I. BACKGROUND

Edmark is the creator, patent holder, manufacturer and a distributor of a vegetable slicer known as the “Super Slicer” (the Edmark Slicer). The Edmark Slicer was developed during a period of about 25 months starting in 1990. (Declaration of Sam…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mary Kay, Inc. v. WeberDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Bulbs 4 East Side, Inc. v. RicksDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Condom Sense v. Jamal Alshahabi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  4. GARDEN CITY BOXING CLUB, INC. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Edmark Indus. Sdn. Bhd. v. SOUTH ASIA INT'L (HK)District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API