Grieb v. Department of Liquor Control
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
In our opinion, the lower courts decided the instant controversy correctly.
Although Grieb’s license to sell and dispense alcoholic beverages was revoked because he was found to have violated certain provisions of the General Code, this does not alter the fact that the spirituous liquors he owned at the time of the revocation of his permit were legally manufactured and acquired, and were not a nuisance per se. He had a property right therein which could not be taken away without judicial inquiry and determination.
In other words, intoxicating liquors which have been lawfully obtained and are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- McKown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Corneli v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. MarquisIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Deacon v. LandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sensenbrenner v. CrosbyOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Akron v. DaviesOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. PenrodOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.