Legal Opinion

Quermbeck v. Hanson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1938No. 5943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. It is alleged that the defendant, A1 Hanson, maliciously intending to injure the plaintiff in his good name and reputation, and without probable cause, charged plaintiff in an action filed in the city court of Salt Lake City with the offense of having committed the crime of grand larcency by wilfully and felon-iously stealing, taking, and carrying away personal property of A1 Hanson of the alleged value of $7,000.

It is also alleged that at the request of A1 Hanson and upon his complaint a warrant of arrest was issued and, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croco v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pugmire v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McKinney v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Anderson v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winsness v. YocomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API