Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Carson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1909No. 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fourth District. Eon. J. E. Booth, Judge. Action by John D. McKinney against George Carson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an action for damages to personal property. Respondent, in substance, for a first cause of action, alleged that during the year 1906 he was the owner and in possession of certain grazing'lands, describing them; that during the year 1906 he was the owner of a large number of sheep, including about 1,400 ewes, all of which were herded or kept upon the lands aforesaid; that during the month of September, 1906, the appellant, as the owner, was in charge and control of about 500 buck sheep, which said appellant wrongfully, willfully, and negligently permitted to enter upon said grazing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Croco v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pugmire v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Groot v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. GreeneUtah Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holt v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Cascade Milling & Elevator Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  3. Makemson v. DillonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Simmons v. WilkinUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fraser v. CrounseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API