Legal Opinion
Kocourek v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 2011PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered May 20, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion granted.
Plaintiff was employed as an officer of defendant Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.* from 1987 until his retirement in 2007. Prior to March 1992, plaintiff was a participant in a traditional stock rights plan. The plan provided that each year, at defendants’ discretion, plaintiff would be given the option of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- MBIA Insurance v. Greystone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cherebin v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sheppard v. Blitman/Atlas Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Castle v. Gaseteria Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by22 opinions
- McGhee v. OdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Robinson v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bag Bag v. AlcobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Goodwin v. Empire City Subway Co., Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Tri-Tec Design, Inc. v. Zatek Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.