Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Day

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 2013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered April 17, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff leave to amend his amended complaint, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to deny leave with respect to the thirteenth, twenty-seventh, thirtieth, thirty-third, thirty-fourth, and thirty sixth causes of action of the second amended complaint (SAC), and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

We are not persuaded by defendants’ argument that they have been prejudiced by plaintiffs allegedly excessive delay in moving to amend. “Mere lateness is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Management, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hosking v. TPG Capital Management, L.P. (In re Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Davis v. M & M Developer, LLC (In re MBM Entertainment, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Ferrarella v. GodtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Ray v. RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Shugrue v. StahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API