Legal Opinion · Dissent
Sands v. Menard, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 2010No. 2008AP1703Published
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 71. (dissenting). I do not join the majority opinion because I conclude that the majority has "exceeded its powers" by "manifestly disregarding the law" in its decision to vacate the arbitration panel's award of reinstatement.
¶ 72. I agree with the circuit court and court of appeals, both of which denied Menard's motion to vacate the arbitration award for reinstatement of Dawn *682Sands. These courts reached the right result, largely because they correctly understood the very limited role courts play in reviewing arbitration awards.
¶ 73. At the circuit court, Judge Lenz observed that "at most,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alvin Joel TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Suzanne J. GOSS, Appellant in No. 83-1598 v. EXXON OFFICE SYSTEMS COMPANY, Appellant in No. 83-1557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Gary McKnight Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Mark J. Bruso v. United Airlines, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.