Legal Opinion
State v. Cote
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 13, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.
The respondent is accused of setting traps for lobsters after the suspension of his license. His defense is that his license was suspended without notice and hearing and therefore illegally.
*451The power of the director of sea and shore fisheries to grant licenses to take lobsters is contained in Act of 1921, Chapter 98. His authority to revoke or suspend licenses is derived from Section 4 of the same chapter.
With the revocation of licenses we are not concerned. Itevocation is a consequence of conviction. The respondent has not been convicted. His license has been suspended, not revoked.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Ruggles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- La Croix v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Smith v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Parker v. LesterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Palmetto Fire Ins. Co. v. BehaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Assad v. State Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.