Legal Opinion

King v. Davis

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia

Decided January 25, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion No. 2.

McDOWELL, District Judge.

List of defendants named in the judgment of June 23, 1900:

Original service of original notice and declaration valid as to:

Insufficient as to:

Cyrus Blankenship.

Reese Davis.

Parties defendant now submitting motions:

Same as the first 12 named in judgment.

Parties defendant named in proposed amended return of service of original notice and declaration and amended return of service of notice of July 11, 1898:

Same as first 12 named in the judgment, and, in addition, John Dotson and Jane Mounts.

Some time prior to December 21, 1903, I sent to counsel in this case_…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. United States v. Calcasieu Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
  3. Forty Fort Coal Co. v. KirkendallDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. In re 1610 Avenue P, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API