Legal Opinion

Synatzske v. Gorham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1948No. 9716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND GRAY, Justice.

Mrs. Ethel Synatzske and husband, John Synatzske, sued R. L. Gorham for recovery of $300 paid by Mrs. Synatzske to Gorham, under the terms of a written contract of purchase and sale of real estate executed by Robert H. Delaney as seller, R. L. Gorham as agent for seller, and Mrs. Synatzske as purchaser. John Synatzske did not sign the contract. There is no controversy as to the terms of the contract, and the evidence is undisputed thait: at the date of the contract, plaintiffs were husband and wife; the husband did not sign the contract; the defendant Gorham was a real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pitts v. ElslerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Foster v. HackworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Hudson v. Compere Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sargent v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. White v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dallas Farm MacHinery Co. v. Minneapolis-Moline Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Bailey v. PolsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Baxter & Swinford, Inc. v. MercierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API