Legal Opinion

Crunden Martin Mfg. Co. v. Turner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1922No. Appeal, No. 348PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Frazer,

Under date of January 5, 1912, plaintiff, a manufacturer of paper bags, entered into a contract with defendant as distributing agent for the exclusive sale to the *428latter, for a period of one year, of his “entire requirements” for paper bags, designated by a particular trade name. Pursuant to the contract, defendant ordered a carload of bags, consisting of 880 bundles, or separate packages, containing in all 5,000,000 bags. Delivery was made March 5, 1915, and though there was subsequent correspondence between the parties relating to a claim by defendant for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. F. B. Fogel & Co. v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Doane v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Farrington v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Slattery v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Truscon Steel Co. v. Fuhrmann & Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Brookside Distilling Products Corp. v. Monarch Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Comfort Springs Corp. v. Allancraft Furniture Shop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Foell Packing Co. v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API