Carol Management Corp. v. Maxwell Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Appellant, defendant below, seeks review of a final judgment entered in favor of ap-pellee in an action to recover the balance due on a contract for furniture and fixtures delivered to appellant pursuant to ten purchase order agreements.
At the trial, testimony was presented and the court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of appellee as to nine of the ten purchase order agreements. The tenth purchase order covered 300 sets of lamps, each set consisting of two Donald Hansen lamps and one hanging fixture, in the total amount of $19,238.36. In the final judg*774ment it was found…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hay v. SalisburySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Mims v. ReidSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Gaynon v. StatumSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beck v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CAS. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Kassner v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Cohen v. Teak House, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977