Legal Opinion
In Re City of Trenton Ordinance
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 17, 2009No. A-5864-08T3PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
984 A.2d 895 (2009)
411 N.J. Super. 135
In re Petition for Referendum on CITY OF TRENTON ORDINANCE 09-02.
No. A-5864-08T3.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 14, 2009.
Decided December 17, 2009.
George T. Dougherty argued the cause for appellant Committee of Petitioners Against Ordinance 09-02 (Katz & Dougherty, attorneys; Mr. Dougherty, on the brief).
William W. Northgrave argued the cause for respondent City of Trenton (McManimon & Scotland, attorneys; Edward J. McManimon, III and Mr. Northgrave, Newark, on the brief).
Ira G. Megdal, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010