Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 2002No. 2D00-2097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

Kenneth Ingraham appeals his convictions of arson and burglary. We reverse because the search warrant for his apartment did not comport with the constitutional requirement that the items to be seized be set forth with particularity. U.S. Const, amend. IY; Art. I, § 12, Fla. Const. See also §§ 933.04, .05, Fla. Stat. (1999).

At approximately 5:43 a.m. on June 3, 1999, Tampa Fire Rescue received a call regarding a fire at the Palma Ceia Little League building, which was used for storage as well as housing a concession stand. City of Tampa police officer Troy Neal responded to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCauley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. TRUMAINE MOODY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API