Legal Opinion

Dynalectric Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Clark & Sullivan Constructors, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2011No. 51758PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we address the measure of damages applicable to promissory estoppel claims. We adopt a flexible approach as suggested in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts and apply the same factors that bear on promissory estoppel relief to the remedy afforded by the breach. The determination of the appropriate measure of damages in any given case turns on considerations of what justice requires and the foreseeability and certainty of the particular damages award sought. We further conclude that the presumptive measure of damages for a general contractor that reasonably relies upon…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Merex A.G. Merex Corporation and Peter C. Lachmann v. Fairchild Weston Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Vancheri v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Janke Construction Company, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Preload Technology, Inc. v. A.B. & J. Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Khan v. BakhshNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Weitz Co. v. Hands, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Crowley, Esq. v. BurkeNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re: FREDRIK ABULYAN (Deceased) and KARINE GHADYANUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API