Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London Globe Ins. Co. v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 5, 1917No. 1826PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiff in error insists that under the undisputed facts there was no such occupancy of the dwelling as the policy contemplated, and that the court should have directed a verdict for the defendant as requested. It is believed that the court should have .directed a verdict for the defendant on this issue, and that the plaintiff in error’s insistence of error should be sustained. The precise facts of this case are that the tenant and his family, occupying the dwelling as a residence on October 5th, went to another place six miles distant to pick cotton,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Ashworth v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Limburg v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- German-American Insurance v. EvantsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. of New York v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Hudson Ins. Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Republic Ins. Co. v. Fulbright Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. ReddittTexas Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.