Legal Opinion

Victor G. Reiling Associates & Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 14, 2006No. 3:03CV222 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR A NEW TRIAL [Doc. # 273]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

On February 6, 2006, after a three-week trial, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff Design Innovation (“DI”) on its claims of misappropriation and unfair competition against defendant Fisher-Price (“FP”) for using the Reel Heroes toy concept submitted by DI and co-plaintiff Victor Reiling without compensation, awarding damages to DI in the form of reasonable royalties in the amount of $1.7 million. 1 Familiarity with the facts of this case, as fully described in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Craig P. Nadel, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alliance Security Products, Inc. v. Fleming Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Sokol Holdings, Inc. v. BMB Munai, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Wexler v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API