Victor G. Reiling Associates & Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR A NEW TRIAL [Doc. # 273]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
On February 6, 2006, after a three-week trial, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff Design Innovation (“DI”) on its claims of misappropriation and unfair competition against defendant Fisher-Price (“FP”) for using the Reel Heroes toy concept submitted by DI and co-plaintiff Victor Reiling without compensation, awarding damages to DI in the form of reasonable royalties in the amount of $1.7 million. 1 Familiarity with the facts of this case, as fully described in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Craig P. Nadel, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alliance Security Products, Inc. v. Fleming Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Sokol Holdings, Inc. v. BMB Munai, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Wexler v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022