In re: S.G.V.S. & D.D.R.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TYSON, Judge.
*21 Respondent, the mother of the juveniles S.G.V.S. and D.D.R.S., appeals from orders terminating her parental rights and denying her motion to re-open the evidence pursuant to Rule 59. We reverse and remand.
*22 I. Background
On 16 April 2015, three-year-old S.G.V.S. walked unaccompanied into a gas station. S.G.V.S. was carrying a bag with diapers, wipes, and a phone, and she had a bruise on her nose. Respondent was located and met with social workers from the Haywood County Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS") and the police at her home. Respondent reported that she had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: E.A.C., P.A.C., J.M.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- In re: E.A.C., P.A.C., J.M.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021