WP 6 Restaurant Management Group, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 WP 6 RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01506-KJD-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. [Docket No. 29] 10 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE 11 COMPANY, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 14 Docket No. 29. Defendant filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 31. Plaintiff filed a reply. 15 Docket No. 33. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the 16 reasons discussed below, the motion for leave to amend is GRANTED.1 17…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Morgal v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Genentech, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
- U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. ResoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.