Legal Opinion
Ford v. Houston Independent School District
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 18, 2015No. Civ. A. H-13-2598PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, seeking overtime compensation for “extra” work that Plaintiffs Harold Ford (“Ford”) and Joffery Reid, Jr. (“Reid”) performed, allegedly willfully denied in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1) et seq., is Defendant the Houston Independent School District’s (“HISD’s”) motion for summary judgment (instrument # 12) based on the “occasional or sporadic” exemption under 29 U.S.C. § 207(p)(2) and its implementing regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 553.30.
While…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Segura v. J.W. Drilling, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Segura v. J.W. Drilling, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- North v. General Plastics and Composites, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Segura v. J.W. Drilling, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Webb v. McQuadeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022