Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. CPC International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1982No. 81-4172PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
In March, 1980, Goldberg, representing a class of indirect purchasers, filed a class action in the California state court, alleging violations of the Cartwright Act, Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code § 16700 et seq., and restraint of trade under California common law. She named as defendants eight corporate manufacturers of corn derivatives, all incorporated in states other than California, and 100 Doe defendants, 50 of whom were allegedly California citizens.
On April 29, 1980, defendants removed the suit from state to federal court, claiming diversity of citizenship and federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of Inglewood v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Goldberg v. CPC International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
- A. E. Stokes and Estelle Stokes v. James H. Reeves and Isham P. Nelson, Jr., Doing Business as Reeves and NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by31 opinions
- Galt G/S v. JSS ScandinaviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Coker v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Richmond v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.