Orricer v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RENTTO, Judge.
Petitioner was found guilty of burglary in the second degree and sentenced to 15 years in the penitentiary. Although at the trial he was represented by two experienced criminal lawyers whom he had engaged, he filed, pro se, a motion for a new trial. Counsel was then appointed to represent him as an indigent defendant. This counsel promptly filed a supplement to his motion for a new trial. The new trial having been denied an appeal from the judgment was prosecuted.
Our opinion affirming the judgment appealed from is reported in 80 S.D. 126, 120 N.W.2d 528. Since it relates the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Coleman v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Zemina v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1977
- Jill S. N. Schaffer v. Bryan BeringerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Charles R. Orricer v. Donald R. Erickson, Warden of the South Dakota State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.