Legal Opinion

Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1915No. 19,217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*177The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an appeal by the railway company from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor for injuries sustained while in its employ.

When the case was here before, Barker v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 767, 129 Pac. 1151, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor-was reversed on account of error in the admission of evidence, and because the instructions assumed some of the facts in issue. The action was brought under the federal employers’ liability act (35 U. S. Stat. at L., p. 65), and one of the questions is whether at the time he received his inj uries the plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Every v. RainsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spinden v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Ballard v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Foley v. HinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API