Legal Opinion

Keener v. CITY OF HERRIN

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2009No. 107658PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The substantive issue presented for our consideration, as framed by the appellant, City of Herrin, is “[wjhether the provision of Chapter 745 ILCS Section 10/4 — 107[,] which grants absolute immunity to a local public entity for releasing a person in custody[,] is applicable to the factual situation herein *** which involves an occurrence at which time the police were neither in control or present at the accident scene.” Like the appellate court (385 Ill. App. 3d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. VincentIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Bank of Lake Zurich v. ThillIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mitchell v. Fiat-Allis, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. LaugharnIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Allstate Insurance v. KovarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Columbus-Cuneo-Cabrini Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. People v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Blazyk v. Daman Express, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Oruta v. B.E.W.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API