People v. Fields
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, J.*
We granted review to decide whether the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, or any of the statutory provisions implementing its protection, bar defendant’s retrial on a greater offense on which jurors failed to reach agreement when, in the same proceeding, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on a separately charged lesser included offense. In resolving this issue we are called upon to reconcile an apparent tension between two distinct and well-established double jeopardy doctrines: the “implied acquittal” doctrine, under which the jury’s verdict of guilty on…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.