Legal Opinion

People v. Fields

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1996No. S044641PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.*

We granted review to decide whether the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, or any of the statutory provisions implementing its protection, bar defendant’s retrial on a greater offense on which jurors failed to reach agreement when, in the same proceeding, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on a separately charged lesser included offense. In resolving this issue we are called upon to reconcile an apparent tension between two distinct and well-established double jeopardy doctrines: the “implied acquittal” doctrine, under which the jury’s verdict of guilty on…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API